Thursday, October 8, 2026 · Week 41 Reading for Oct. 8 · Last entry Oct. 6
Paperclip Index

Weekly reading · methodology v0.6

Window ending Aug. 18, 2025

Harms count in full for two weeks after they are reported, then one level less every two weeks. The control floor looks at reports from July 20, 2025 through Aug. 18, 2025. A selected catalogue of reported AI incidents, reviewed through Oct. 7, 2026. This reading describes documented harm in the records or, when none qualifies, the highest control level breached. It is not a forecast or a measure of all AI activity.

Current recalculation

3

Control failures only · No qualifying harm. The reading is the highest control level breached: 3, by 1 record. It is a level, not a count.

Recalculated from the catalogue in this build. Historical backcasts were not published at the time.

Published at the time

No publication snapshot exists for this week.

Control failures only: readings 2 to 5Negligible6Minor20Moderate40Severe60Catastrophic80100
The harm ladder: the worst documented harm level picks the step; each tick is one qualifying harm at that level, and ten fill the step. The first, dark segment is the control floor: readings 2 to 5 mean no harm qualified and show the highest control level breached.

This is a backcast from the current catalogue. It was not a reading published at the time.

Records behind this reading

5 selected records; 0 documented external harms counting (1 qualifying). Records and ratings below reflect the current catalogue.

No harm counts in this week. The reading is the highest control level breached: 3 (set by 1 record: PI-0021). It is a level, not a count.

Documented harm
1
No harm found (stated scope)
0
No harm reported
2
Impact unknown
0
Alleged, AI role uncorroborated
2
Counts toward the index
1
Unverified, watching
2
Alleged in court
0
Control failure, tracked
2
Tracked separately
0

Documented exclusions: 0 internal; 0 awaiting evidence review. 0 qualifying records with a bounded single-source review.

Inspect the evidence · 5 records

Status totals cover counted records; aliases, superseded aggregates and records tracked separately are excluded. Eligibility and extent notes overlap those totals. These observations are not statistical uncertainty bounds.

  1. PI-0017
  2. PI-0021
  3. PI-0022
  4. PI-0023
  5. PI-0024

Sources

These links support the records above. Source availability and conclusions may change.

  1. GitHub: Gemini CLI 'lost' files during a failed file move operation. [Windows] (issue #4586)Cited in PI-0017
  2. GitHub (issue reporter): Reporter's correction: files found in the C: drive root (issue #4586 comment)Cited in PI-0017
  3. GitHub (issue reporter): Gemini CLI PowerShell session log attached to issue #4586Cited in PI-0017
  4. Slashdot: Google's Gemini CLI deletes user's files (Slashdot; repeats the pre-correction account)Cited in PI-0017
  5. AI Incident Database: AI Incident Database, incident 1178Cited in PI-0017
  6. Cloudflare: Restricted-domain tests and crawler observationsCited in PI-0021
  7. Perplexity: Agents or Bots? Making Sense of AI on the Open WebCited in PI-0021
  8. TechRepublic: Cloudflare Accuses AI Startup of 'Stealth Crawling Behavior' Across Millions of SitesCited in PI-0021
  9. TechRadar: Perplexity hits back after Cloudflare slams its online scraping toolsCited in PI-0021
  10. Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases: A case of bromism influenced by use of artificial intelligenceCited in PI-0022
  11. NBC News: Man who asked ChatGPT about cutting out salt from his diet was hospitalized with hallucinationsCited in PI-0022
  12. Business Standard: ChatGPT salt swap advice lands man in hospital with bromide poisoningCited in PI-0022
  13. Psychiatric Times: Bromine and bromism: what's old is new againCited in PI-0022
  14. arXiv (Nassi, Cohen, Yair): Invitation Is All You Need! Promptware Attacks Against LLM-Powered Assistants in Production Are Practical and DangerousCited in PI-0023
  15. Ben Nassi, Stav Cohen, Or Yair (Tel Aviv University, Technion, SafeBreach): Invitation Is All You Need (researchers' project page, with Google's response)Cited in PI-0023
  16. The Register: Infosec hounds spot prompt injection vuln in Google Gemini appsCited in PI-0023
  17. Dark Reading: Google Gemini AI Bot Hijacks Smart Homes, Turns Off the LightsCited in PI-0023
  18. The Decoder: Attackers can hijack Google Gemini with a simple prompt hidden in a calendar inviteCited in PI-0023
  19. Reuters: Meta's flirty AI chatbot invited a retiree to New York. He never made it homeCited in PI-0024
  20. Reuters (via BNN Bloomberg): Meta's flirty AI chatbot invited a retiree to New York. He never made it homeCited in PI-0024
  21. Reuters (via CP24): Meta's flirty AI chatbot invited a retiree to New York. He never made it homeCited in PI-0024

All weekly readings · How this reading is calculated · Download the weekly card