Sunday, October 11, 2026
Paperclip Index

Weekly reading · methodology v1.0

Window ending Dec. 22, 2025

Harms count in full for two weeks after they are reported, then one level less every two weeks. The control floor looks at reports from Nov. 23, 2025 through Dec. 22, 2025. A selected catalogue of reported AI incidents, reviewed through Oct. 10, 2026. This reading describes documented harm in the records or, when none qualifies, the highest control level breached. It is not a forecast or a measure of all AI activity.

Current recalculation

2

Control failures only · No qualifying harm. The reading is the highest control level breached: 2, by 1 record. It is a level, not a count.

Recalculated from the catalogue in this build. Historical backcasts were not published at the time.

Published at the time

No publication snapshot exists for this week.

Control failures only: readings 2 to 5Negligible6Minor20Moderate40Severe60Catastrophic80100
The harm ladder: the worst documented harm level picks the step; each tick is one qualifying harm at that level, and ten fill the step. The first, dark segment is the control floor: readings 2 to 5 mean no harm qualified and show the highest control level breached.

This is a backcast from the current catalogue. It was not a reading published at the time.

Records behind this reading

3 selected records; 0 documented external harms counting (1 qualifying). Records and ratings below reflect the current catalogue.

No harm counting that week. The reading is the highest control level breached, 2: a level, not a count (PI-0036). 3 records reported in the last 30 days.

Records behind this reading · 1

1 internal harm excluded.

Only these records move the reading. How it is calculated

  1. PI-0034
    Agentic IDE wiped a user's entire drive when asked to clear a project cacheNov. 27, 2025 · Negligible harm · no longer counting · Deployment
  2. PI-0035
  3. PI-0036
    Newsroom vending agent talked into giving away stock with forged documentsDec. 18, 2025 · Negligible harm · Controlled test

Sources

These links support the records above. Source availability and conclusions may change.

  1. Reddit (r/google_antigravity, affected user): Google Antigravity just deleted the contents of my drive (affected user's Reddit post)Cited in PI-0034
  2. Code With AI (YouTube, affected user): Google Antigravity's Turbo mode erased my drive partition?! Really, the 'smartest' AI? [Video Proof]Cited in PI-0034
  3. The Register: Google Antigravity vibe-codes user's entire drive out of existenceCited in PI-0034
  4. TechRadar: Google's Antigravity AI deleted a developer's drive and then apologizedCited in PI-0034
  5. Gigazine: Google's AI agent makes fatal mistake by wiping a user's entire hard drive without permissionCited in PI-0034
  6. Notebookcheck: Google AI deletes entire partitionCited in PI-0034
  7. AI Incident Database: AI Incident Database report 7050Cited in PI-0034
  8. Reddit (r/ClaudeAI, affected user): Claude CLI deleted my entire home directory (affected user's Reddit post)Cited in PI-0035
  9. Gigazine: Claude Code CLI deletes your Mac's home directoryCited in PI-0035
  10. Simon Willison's Weblog: A quote from Claude (Claude's own diagnosis, quoted from the user's Reddit thread)Cited in PI-0035
  11. claudeissues.com mirror of GitHub issue: [BUG] CRITICAL: Claude Code executed rm -rf deleting entire home directory (issue 10077)Cited in PI-0035
  12. Anthropic: Project Vend: Phase twoCited in PI-0036
  13. The Wall Street Journal: We let AI run our office vending machine. It lost hundreds of dollarsCited in PI-0036
  14. WBUR Here & Now: Letting an AI bot run a vending machineCited in PI-0036
  15. To Vima (WSJ syndication): We let AI run our office vending machine. It lost hundreds of dollars (WSJ, syndicated)Cited in PI-0036
  16. Kottke.org: This AI vending machine was tricked into giving away everythingCited in PI-0036

Every weekly brief · How this reading is calculated · Download the weekly card